Skip to main content

Terrorism

Terrorism works, that's why people do it

(2017 ed. -- This was from an editorial in the Spartan Daily I wrote back in the day)

In a February 2005, speech to the New York Council on Foreign Relations Donald Rumsfeld, secretary of defense, acknowledged that America was losing the propaganda war for the “hearts and minds” of the Muslim world. He spent the majority of his time talking about possible solutions to the problem, with the primary conclusion being that we needed to beef up our public relation efforts.
The complex and ongoing “War on Terror” thing has apparently been reduced to figuring out how to control the spin.

What Rumsfeld didn’t talk about was the legitimate grievances that fuel the violence in the Middle East: America’s long history of changing regimes that don’t support us, our continued support for oppressive dictatorships, our history of oil exploitation, and, number one with a bullet, our support for the state of Israel.

He also didn’t talk about the biggest dirty secret of all -- that sometimes terrorism works.
In 1946, Menachin Begin, a future prime minister of Israel, was part of a Jewish terrorist group known as the Irgun. On July 22 of that year his group planted explosives in the King David Hotel in Jerusalem and leveled the seven-story building to the ground, killing 91 people — men, women and children.

Shortly after the explosion, the British gave up their United Nations mandate to govern Palestine and left the country.

In 1983 a truck loaded with explosives and driven by a member of the terrorist group Hezbollah drove up to an apartment building used to house an American force trying to stabilize a crumbling Lebanon. The truck detonated, leveling the building and killing 243 Marines.

Two months after the explosion, the Marines evacuated Lebanon.
In 1976, a stylish, young female Sri Lankan smiled and placed a wreath around the head of Rajiv Gandhi, then the prime minister of India, and triggered a belt-bomb that blew his body to pieces.
Shortly after, Indian peace-keeping forces left Sri Lanka and its government got on with its war with the Tamil guerrillas.

Terrorism has also worked to change political regimes.

The 1916 Easter uprising lead to the formation of the Republic of Ireland and the Madrid bombings of 2004 helped change the ruling party of Spain.

In America we tend to see terrorism as a great evil inflicted on us, but from the terrorist point of view it’s a way of waging war against something too strong to attack directly. It keeps strongly felt positions from being ignored and can, in the case of Palestine, give a sense of identity to a stateless people.

In times of war it has always been a tradition to make the enemy less than human, to color their motivations with black and white shades of evil. We find ways to objectify and depersonalize those we are at war with. It’s easier to fight demons than people; it’s less real and easier to get up for.
But the “War on Terror” is different.

We are fighting an enemy without soldiers, only “enemy combatants” without legal rights or standing. We are not fighting on a piece of land; we have no fixed assets to target with our military. The only real measurement of progress in this war is found in a negative—if nothing bad happens, we win. Unlike most wars, it’s hard to see any endpoint where we can say it’s over and get back to “normal.”

Rumsfeld has it wrong, it’s not about spin or media bias, it’s about what we have done and how that has been perceived by the rest of the world.

We launched a preemptive war in Iraq with all the responsibilities that entails. That’s a fact, and any discussion about our faulty intelligence, our historical motives, and our long term goals are all legitimate items for discussion. The fact that people violently disagree with us does not make them demons or evil and the more we bring that fact into the light of day, the faster we can find a compromise in diplomacy that allows us to be safe in our own country.

Or we can build a 20-foot barrier wall around our interests and hope for the best. Israel could help us with any technical difficulties in its erection; they should have their wall up in the next year or so.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wedding and Funeral

Went to a wedding and a funeral this weekend with Mary. Sacramento, Santa Rosa, then home– a whirlwind trip through weekend bay area traffic. The traffic was horrible – life changing horrible, but not unusual.
As with most things, it’s a balance of an the unnamed terror and an easy chair in a padded room that rocks. 
The wedding was delightful, part of an interconnected strong woman’s club that marries off their daughters to provably weaker men. And so, the cycle continues, but the company was nice and I’m too old to wonder at the process anymore.
The funeral was for another interconnected strong woman, who, by hinkey or dinky, was a scary woman that I used to work with as a nurse. She would have been surprised that I outlived her, much as Charles the cat was. Please pay attention out there – this is how life works.
(To be fair, she didn’t put up with shit and I liked to throw handfuls of it around as if I were Christ standing on the back of a broken piƱata heaving candy cigarettes to the…

Only once

For clarity, I think I will write this only once.I do not write confessional poetry, and I do not write things down as a form of therapy. I write because I have something unique to say in a unique sort of way, a way that I think is universal in an analogous manner, not as any sort of literal telling of the truth.  I trowel spackle onto pages with a straight edged blade, I don’t paint aging widows with a brush. (My soul has been psychedelicized, but this shit’s not about me.)It comes in this form – that this relates to that, in this way – A form that I think illustrates things that are too true to be looked at straight on – personal truths that are usually discovered through interactions with other people – truths that are often relational, unreliable and subject to the weavings and debris of human beings. Truths that sneak out and become a miraculous surprise of insight – like a Zen master hitting you on the head with a baseball bat at just the right time.I don’t think I’m the only on…

How do I know when I'm done?

I left a message on Facebook for someone I care about that ended with the words, “one won”. I did it just because I thought was funny. That led to a whimsical discovery that I no longer had to place a period at the end of my sentences – in fact to do so would be rude and identify myself as an old person. 
It seems that, for online use anyway, a period has become a loud shout -- a purposeful exclamation point useful only in drawing unnecessary attention, or as a way of making an angry burp of anti-social angst. Sentences no longer end, they gently back out a side door when no one is looking -- they’ve become bars without a jail, or that angry driver just ahead of you who hesitates before moving through an intersection just to make a point of how stupid you are.
Since a period is no longer an end to a thought, its new function has evidentially become nothing but a stuffy ritual of formality that writers can now use to mark up or down generalized feeling of huffiness, or perhaps a way to s…